How does SVN 1.8 merging compare with DVCS like Git & Mercurial? -


i asked question 3 years ago: how and/or why merging in git better in svn?

back think on svn 1.6 we've reached 1.8 , seems merging 1 area they've done substantial work on.

so in light of these changes, has svn 1.8 caught better merging , branching support in dvcs git?

svn 1.8 seem have advanced things 'reingtegration' being automatic action. don't have dance keep branch alive after it's been merged more.

these real annoyances me, , it's they're gone.

the thing svn merging seems have problems handling of mergeinfo records. if you're not aware, these properties added points in tree when merge done. record versions ancestors of merged version, when merge done changes in versions aren't re-merged.

unfortunately svn seems confused , i've see apply changes multiple times. think there's fundamental flaw way records it's merged, i've never been able work out what's gone wrong.

fact branching , merging afterthought , low priority feature svn, whereas it's fundamental feature of dvcss. branching works in svn, i've used quite heavily. it's better vcs. don't think ever work quite branching in dvcs.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

basic authentication with http post params android -

vb.net - Virtual Keyboard commands -

css - Firefox for ubuntu renders wrong colors -